ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has directly affected global healthcare, especially the front-line of healthcare provision, including emergency medical services (EMS). The present study aimed to compare EMS processing times and the number of acute stroke patients serviced by EMS before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective observational review of Bangkok Surgico Medical Ambulance and Rescue Team (S.M.A.R.T.) EMS data from 2018 to 2021. The EMS processing times and the number of acute strokes were compared between pre-COVID-19 era (January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2019) and during COVID-19 pandemic (January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021). Results: The number of stroke patients transported by EMS in one year, before and during COVID-19 pandemic was 128 and 150 cases, respectively (Change difference = 17.2%, 95% CI: 11.1-24.9). However, the average number of acute stroke patients per week was not significantly different (p = 0.386). The mean total EMS processing times before and during COVID-19 era were 25.59 ± 11.12 and 45.47 ± 14.61 minutes, respectively (mean difference of 19.88 (95% CI: 16.77-22.99) minutes; p < 0.001). The mean time from symptom onset to EMS arrival (p < 0.001), the mean call time (p < 0.001), the mean response time (p < 0.001), and the mean scene time (p < 0.001) were significantly higher during COVID-19 period. The mean transportation times for stroke patients was similar before and during COVID-19 pandemic (10.14 ± 6.28 and 9.41 ± 6.31 minutes, respectively; p = 0.338). Conclusions: During COVID-19 pandemic, the number of acute stroke patients serviced by EMS increased substantially, but there was no difference in the average number of patients per week. During the pandemic, EMS processing times markedly increased.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is a global issue. Many people are concerned about experiencing side effects from the vaccine. This study evaluated satisfaction with the COVID-19 vaccine in the general population (GP) and healthcare workers (HCWs) in Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed from September-December 2021. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare GP and HCW participants' total vaccine satisfaction scores as well as their satisfaction with varying vaccine types. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of satisfaction scores among GP and HCWs. RESULTS: A total of 780 valid questionnaire responses were obtained. The majority of GP participants (n = 390) had received their first (93.3%) and second (88.5%) vaccination shots by viral vector vaccine; however, 90% had not received a third dose (booster). In contrast, the majority of HCW participants (n = 390) had received their first (92.8%) and second (82.8%) vaccination doses by the inactivated vaccine, and 83% had received a third vaccine dose. HCWs had significantly higher total satisfaction scores than GP participants (p = 0.034), and they were also significantly more satisfied with the mRNA vaccine as a third dose (p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression models found less association with vaccine satisfaction among GP participants who had not isolated following exposure to COVID-19 and those who have never been at risk of infection (ᵦ -0.159; 95% CI -12.867, -1.877; p = 0.009). Among HCWs, being married (ᵦ 0.157; 95% CI 0.794, 3.278; p = 0.001) or divorced (ᵦ 0.198; 95% CI 3.303, 9.596; p < 0.01) was more closely associated with vaccine satisfaction than being single. CONCLUSION: HCWs were more satisfied with the type and efficacy of inactivated, viral vector, and mRNA vaccines than GP participants, and the former were also more satisfied with the cost of vaccine boosters. Our results indicate that satisfaction with the COVID-19 vaccine is based on academic knowledge sharing and the government's promotion efforts. Future research will explore strategies to raise awareness about the importance of vaccination.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a global concern. Many individuals are concerned about the potential side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine boosters. The purpose of this study was to assess attitudes and satisfaction concerning COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine boosters in the population in Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey measuring COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and satisfaction was distributed from September to December 2021. Multiple linear regression was used to explore associations between demographic variables and questionnaire results. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to examine associations between attitude and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: A total of 780 questionnaire responses were obtained. The largest groups of participants reported having obtained a first vaccination dose via viral vaccine (52.8%), a second vaccination booster via viral vaccine (49.5%), and a third vaccination booster via mRNA vaccine (28.8%). Multiple linear regression revealed a lower association between vaccine attitude scores and having earned less than a bachelor's degree (ß -0.109; 95% CI -2.541, -0.451) and infection risk without self-isolating (ß -0.154; 95% CI -4.152, -0.670) compared with attaining a bachelor's degree or higher and never having being at risk of infection, respectively. Higher vaccine satisfaction scores were more closely associated with being married than being single (ß 0.074; 95% CI -0.073, 3.022), whereas lower vaccine satisfaction scores were less closely associated with non-healthcare workers (ß -0.143; 95% CI -4.698, -0.831) and infection risk without self-isolating (ß -0.132; 95% CI -6.034, -0.502) compared with non-healthcare workers and never being at risk of infection. There was weak but significant positive correlation between attitude and satisfaction scores (r = 0.338, p-value < 0.001). Hence, a gradual decline in protection following vaccination and the positive effects of a booster dose after primary vaccination have made the decision to administer booster doses. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that policymakers need to develop more effective strategies to raise awareness about the importance of vaccination.